Sex melayu saiful 84 sex chat in singapore
They all failed totally to achieve their paid objectives.
The government's press release then went on to say: "The police report against Anwar Ibrahim was brought by a private individual - Anwar's employee and personal assistant - not by the government.
Did they share legal information during their pillow talk? I think about the fact that Saiful was engaged to another woman at that time. And yet he betrayed her and engaged in an affair with another woman, who was on the prosecuting team.
To betray your fiancée, the woman you promised to share your life with, the woman you said you loved and promised to marry, means that you are a liar and a cheat.
Especially telling were the comments of Mark Trowell (), a Queen’s Counsel who represented the IPU, LAWASIA, and the Law Council of Australia.
He said the decision of the Federal Court "was unconvincing and lacked a detailed analysis of the facts." Further blasting the court, he said that "in reaching these conclusions, the court rejected or ignored the evidence that raised serious doubts about the reliability of so-called independence evidence and the credibility of the complainant." In the most damning statement of all, Trowell said, "If the court had proper regard to the facts and the law, Anwar Ibrahim should never have been convicted." As for the ICJ, it said, "Anwar Ibrahim should never have been investigated, charged with, tried, let alone convicted of and sentenced for such charges." wrote in an editorial, "The criminal case used to imprison Mr Anwar, who has been one of the foremost advocates of liberal democracy in the Muslim world, was as morally reprehensible as it was farcical...
And didn't attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail just say that the reason Saiful also was not charged for consensual sex was because he had turned state's witness and agreed to testify against Anwar?
So if it was consensual, why does the Prime Minister's Office call Saiful a "victim" of sexual assault?
In cross-examination of the prosecution's witnesses, it was exposed that DNA taken from blood samples was planted on the infamous mattress.
If you say that Saiful () was assaulted, then we are back to square one - the government's original and totally unbelievable claim - that a young, strong, strapping man was raped time and time again by someone who was 40 years older than he was - but somehow was never able to escape. Finally, as I wrote this, I saw that the Federal Court's written judgment has now been released.
They said that the testimony of distinguished DNA experts like Dr Brian Mc Donald and Dr David D Wells was not credible. They chose Saiful over these distinguished Australian academics.
Many Malaysians have commented on the speed with which the government responded to the Federal Court's verdict last Tuesday, in which the jurists found Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim, guilty of sodomy and sentenced him to five years in prison.
Less than 20 minutes after the chief justice announced the court's decision, an official government statement was sent to the media, both Malaysian and international.